Program-Level Definitions of Online Learning
Frank Mayadas and I will appreciate your comments on these DRAFT definitions of online learning at the program level.
Many thanks for your participation in this process.
Gary
PROGRAM-LEVEL DEFINITIONS
Just as definitions help distinguish among the different uses of online capabilities at the course level, similar distinctions can be made at the program level. Degree and certificate programs can be designed with a mix of traditional and e-learning courses in order to serve populations who have different levels of access to campus.
Traditional Program—The program may include a mix of traditional, web-enhanced, or blended/hybrid courses but all courses require some face-to-face sessions.
These programs take advantage of web-based applications to enhance learning, but without changing the traditional requirement that students attend most classes on campus.
Flexible Program – Fewer than 60 percent but at least 30 percent of the courses in a program are offered in a fully online or hybrid format, increasing flexibility for students who must come to campus regularly to complete the program.
These programs increase flexibility for on-campus and commuting students, making them more accessible to working adults and others who live nearby but who need some scheduling flexibility.
Blended Program – At least 60 percent of the courses required for program completion are offered fully online or as independent study. Up to twenty percent of courses may be offered as face-to-face or hybrid courses; students are required to come to campus for occasional courses or intensive residencies.
These programs provide increased access to distant students who are able to come to campus for laboratory work, intensive residencies, or occasional group sessions. Ideally, face-to-face sessions will be organized to minimize travel requirements for distant students. Some academic support services should be available to distant students as well.
Fully Online Program – All courses in the program are offered as fully online courses; no face-to-face courses. Students can complete the program completely at a distance, with no required face-to-face meetings.
Fully online programs are designed with the truly distant student in mind. Institutions that offer fully online programs should also take care to provide support services—registration, testing, advising, library support, etc.—at a distance.
- Login to post comments

Comments
Fully online programs
It is important that the orientation be online as well. Where an on campus orientation is required we restrict those at a distance
Comments on v2 Program definitions
Comments on the current version of the definitions:
1) It appears that the guiding principle behind the distinctions in definitions is to differentiate levels of access based on the old ALN typology of 'on campus/near campus/distant'. That still seems to be a decent typology, although a brief but more detailed description of why this typology is useful would be helpful.
2) The proposed distinction between "flexible" and "blended" programs is problematic. Relative flexibility is a characteristic of all types of programs, so labeling one type of program "flexible" confuses the issue. Given that "flexible" is a new term not commonly used in this context, making this distinction implies that blended programs are not flexible by definition, when in fact blended programs are actually more flexible than flexible ones in the proposed definitions.
3) The thresholds of 30 and 60 percent are arbitrary; although there is currently no alternative which is commonly used, the thresholds require justification. It is not clear, for example, why the 30-60 percent range would help commuting students better than, say 20 to 80 percent or 40 to 90 percent.
4) Defining a "traditional" program as including hybrid/blended courses is problematic -- the use of blended courses in programs is relatively new and not sufficiently well-established to be characterized as "traditional", which makes the current formulation of the definition misleading.
Here is my proposed reformulation for consideration, which eliminates the need to provide arbitrary thresholds:
Campus-Based Program—All program courses require face-to-face sessions.
Campus-based programs include any mix of traditional, web-enhanced, or blended/hybrid courses which do not change the traditional requirement that students attend all courses on campus. Such programs may use blended/hybrid courses with online components, but not in sufficient quantity to afford access to commuting or distant students.
Partially Blended Program – A significant proportion of program courses is offered in blended/hybrid and/or fully online format.
These programs increase flexibility for on-campus students and afford access to commuting students, making them more accessible to working adults and others who live nearby but who need some scheduling flexibility. Partially blended programs are most likely to attract a mix of commuting and on-campus students. A sufficiently large proportion of program courses must be available in online and/or blended/hybrid formats to attract commuting students. Blended programs are not likely to afford sufficient access to attract distant students because of on-campus attendance requirements.
Fully Blended Program – All program courses are offered in a blended/hybrid or online format; some but not all program courses are offered in an online format.
These programs increase flexibility for on-campus and commuting students, making them more accessible to working adults and others who live nearby but who need greater scheduling flexibility. Fully blended programs are most likely to attract commuting students. Fully blended programs are not likely to afford sufficient access to attract distant students because of on-campus attendance requirements in blended/hybrid courses.
Online Program w/Visitation Requirement – Most or all courses in the program courses are offered fully online; students are required to come to campus to complete limited but specified program requirements.
These programs provide increased access to distant students who are able to come to campus to complete certain program requirements such as laboratory work, intensive residencies, or occasional group sessions. Face-to-face sessions may be organized to minimize travel requirements for distant students. Academic support services should be available to distant students.
Fully Online Program – All courses in the program are offered as fully online courses; students can complete the program completely at a distance, with no required face-to-face meetings.
Fully online programs are designed with the truly distant student in mind. Institutions that offer fully online programs should also take care to provide support services—registration, testing, advising, library support, etc.—at a distance. Equivalent face-to-face courses may be available, but they are not required to complete the program.
Just want to say I definitely
Just want to say I definitely see the content of this I tried to find today. This brief article is directly at the time. Thanks for your time to write and also to see him. This could be one of the best pieces I have had for a long time. Crescent Processing
Visitation and orientation
Regional accreditation?
Way back in 1999, California State University Hayward (now East Bay) had to go through WASCs "substantive change" process because 50% or more (in our case, 100%) of the courses in our new MS Ed option Online Teaching & Learning program were "offered through correspondence, distance education, or [are] electronically monitored." This still applies to new programs. http://www.wascsenior.org/findit/files/forms/2010_Substantive_Change_Manual.pdf
Wouldn't it be useful for us to use the 50% figure as a cutoff for online programs? Then we can keep doing our own fine tuning.